Tested ISO: https://github.com/rescuezilla/rescuezilla/releases/download/2.4/rescuezilla-2.4-64bit.jammy.iso. then there is no point in implementing a USB-based Secure Boot loader. 1: The Windows 7 USB/DVD Download Tool is not compatible with USB 3.0. if this issue was addressed), it could probably be Secure Boot signed, in the same manner as UEFI:NTFS was itself Secure Boot signed. Rufus or WoeUSB, in several meaningful ways.The program does not extract ISO images or other image formats to the USB drive but . This seem to be disabled in Ventoy's custom GRUB). I also hope that the people who are adamant about never disabling Secure Boot do realize that, as it stands, the current version of Ventoy leaves them about as exposed as if Secure Boot was disabled, which of course isn't too great Thankfully, this can be fixed so that, even when using Ventoy, Secure Boot can continue to fulfill the purpose it was actually designed for. It's the job of Ventoy's custom GRUB to ensure that what is being chainloaded is Secure Boot compliant because that's what users will expect from a trustworthy boot application in a Secure Boot environment. @ValdikSS, I'm not seeing much being debated, when the link you point to appears to indicate that pretty much everybody is in agreement that loading unsigned kernels from GRUB, in a Secure Boot environment, is a bug (hence why it was reported as such). And they can boot well when secure boot is enabled, because they use bootmgr.efi directly from Windows iso. The injection is just like that I extract the ubuntu.iso and change/add some script and create an new ISO file. But I was actually talking about CorePlus. For instance, it could be that only certain models of PC have this problem with certain specific ISOs. Remove Ventoy secure boot key. Currently when boot the ISO file failed as a Virtual CDROM, Ventoy will try to parse the grub configuration file inside the ISO file and try to boot it direclty with. PS: It works fine with original ventoy release (use UEFIinSecureBoot) when Secure boot is enabled. Without complex workarounds, XP does not support being installed from USB. Its ok. Supported / Unsupported ISOs Issue #7 ventoy/Ventoy GitHub Yes. @ValdikSS, I'm afraid I am fairly busy right now and, technically for me, investing time on this can be seen as going towards helping a "competing" product (since I am the creator of Rufus, though I genuinely don't have a problem with healthy competition and I'm quite happy to direct folks, who've been asking to produce a version of Rufus with multiboot for years, to use Ventoy instead), whereas I could certainly use that time to improve my own software . Okay, I installed linux mint 64 bit on this laptop before. Maybe we should just ask the user 'This file is not signed by Microsoft for 'Secure Boot' - do you still wish to boot from it?' I tested it but trying to boot it will fail with an I/O error. DiskGenius If Secure Boot is enabled, signature validation of any chain loaded, If the signature validation fails (i.e. But, currently, that is not the case at all, which means that, independently of the merits of Secure Boot for this or that type of media (which is a completely different debate altogether), there is a breach of the security contract that the user expects to see enforced and therefore something that needs to be addressed. However, I would say that, if you are already running "arbritrary" code in UEFI mode to display a user message, while Secure Boot is enabled, then you should be able to craft your own LoadImage()/StarImage() that doesn't go through SB validation (by copying the LoadImage()/StarImage() code from the EDK2 and removing the validation part). In Windows, some processes will occupy the USB drive, and Ventoy2Disk.exe cannot obtain the control right of the USB drive, so that the device cannot be listed. Both are good. Perform a scan to check if there are any existing errors on the USB. evrything works fine with legacy mode. Guiding you with how-to advice, news and tips to upgrade your tech life. It says that no bootfile found for uefi. Already on GitHub? Adding an efi boot file to the directory does not make an iso uefi-bootable. When Secure Boot is enabled, BIOS boot (CSM) should not work at all, since it would completely defeat the purpose of only allowing signed executables to boot. Worked fine for me on my Thinkpad T420. The MX21_February_x64.iso seems OK in VirtualBox for me. This ISO file doesn't change the secure boot policy. I'd be interested in a shim for Rufus as well, since I have the same issue with wanting UEFI:NTFS signed for Secure Boot, but using GRUB 2 code for the driver, that makes Secure Boot signing it impossible. Customizing installed software before installing LM - Linux Mint Forums Unsigned bootloader Linux ISOs or ISOs without UEFI support does not boot with Secure Boot enabled. Maybe the image does not support X64 UEFI! Firstly, I run into the MOKManager screen and enroll the testkey-ventoy.der and reboot. In WIMBOOT mode (ctrl+w) I get 'Loading files. xx%' and then screen resolution changes and get nice Windows Setup GUI. may tanong po ulit ako yung pc ko po " no bootfile found for uefi image does not support x64 uefi" i am using ventoy galing po sa linux ko, gusto ko po isang laptop ko gawin naman windows, ganyan po lagi naka ilang ulit na po ako, laptop ko po kasi ayaw na bumalik sa windows mula nung ginawa ko syang linux, nagtampo siguro kaya gusto ko na po ibalik sa windows salamat po sa makakasagot at sa . Optional custom shim protocol registration (not included in this build, creates issues). I made a VHD of an arch installation and installed the vtoyboot mod and it keeps on giving me the no UEFI error. You can install Ventoy to USB drive, Removable HD, SD Card, SATA HDD, SSD, NVMe . Sorry for the late test. You need to make the ISO UEFI64 bootable. Now, that one can currently break the trust chain somewhere down the line, by inserting a malicious program at the first level where the trust stops being validated, which, incidentally, as a method (since I am NOT calling Ventoy malicious here) is very similar to what Ventoy is doing for Windows boot, is irrelevant to the matter, because one can very much conceive an OS that is being secured all the way (and, once again, if Microsoft were to start doing just that, then that would most likely mark the end of being able to use Ventoy with Windows ISOs since it would no longer be able to inject an executable that isn't signed by Microsoft as part of the boot process) and that validates the signature of every single binary it runs along the way which means that the trust chain needs to start somewhere and (as far as user providable binaries are concerned) that trust chain starts with Secure Boot. This solution is only for Legacy BIOS, not UEFI. Yeah to clarify, my problem is a little different and i should've made that more clear. Ventoy just create a virtual cdrom device based on the ISO file and chainload to the bootx64.efi/shim.efi inside the ISO file. So maybe Ventoy also need a shim as fedora/ubuntu does. Is Ventoy checking md5sums and refusing to load an iso that doesn't match or something? But, whereas this is good security practice, that is not a requirement. I'm getting the same error when booting "Fedora-Workstation-Live-x86_64-33-1.2.iso" or "pop-os_20.04_amd64_intel_8.iso" on either a new ThinkPad X13 or T14s using Ventoy 1.0.31 UEFI. As with pretty much any other security solution, the point of Secure Boot is mitigation ("If you have enabled Secure Boot then it means you want to be notified about bootloaders that do not match the signatures you allow") and right now, Ventoy results in a complete bypass of this mitigation, which is why I raised this matter. 1. access with key cards) making sure that your safe does get installed there, so that it should give you an extra chance to detect ill intentioned people trying to access its content. Now there's no need to format the disk again and again or to extract anything-- with Ventoy simply copy the ISO file to the USB drive and boot it. Thank you for your suggestions! https://drive.google.com/file/d/1_mYChRFanLEdyttDvT-cn6zH0o6KX7Th/view, https://www.mediafire.com/file/5zui8pq5p0p9zug/Windows10_SuperLite_TeamOS_Edition.iso/file, [issue]: Can't boot Ventoy UEFI Native (Without CSM) on HP ProBook 640g1. How did you get it to be listed by Ventoy? However, because no additional validation is performed after that, this leaves system wild open to malicious ISOs. Say, we disabled validation policy circumvention and Secure Boot works as it should. And IMO, anything that attempts to push the idea that, maybe, allowing silent boot of unsigned bootloaders is not that bad, is actually doing a major disservice to users, as it does weaken the security of their system and, if this is really what a user wants, they can and should disable Secure Boot. mishab_mizzunet 1 yr. ago Also, what GRUB theme are you using? How to Create a Multiboot USB With Ventoy - MUO - Technology, Simplified. No boot file found for UEFI (Arch installation) - reddit Feedback is welcome If your tested hardware or image file is not listed here, please tell me and I will be glad to add it to the table here. The best workaround is to install some Linux variant (I use Fedora but Ubuntu and SUSE are supported) and install VirtualBox. As I understand, you only tested via UEFI, right? This means current is ARM64 UEFI mode. However, I'm not sure whether chainloading of shims are allowed, and how it would work if you try to load for example Ubuntu when you already have Fedora's shim loaded. No bootfile found for UEFI! Issue #313 ventoy/Ventoy GitHub openSUSE-Tumbleweed-XFCE-Live-x86_64-Snapshot20200402-Media - 925 MB, star-kirk-2.1.0-xfce-amd64-live.iso - 518 MB, Porteus-CINNAMON-v5.0rc1-x86_64.iso - 300 MB your point) and you also want them to actually do their designated job, including letting you know, if you have Secure Boot enabled, when some third party UEFI boot loader didn't pass Secure Boot validation, even if that boot loader will only ever be run from someone who has to have physical access to your computer in the first place. Can't install Windows 7 ISO, no install media found ? In Windows, Ventoy2Disk.exe will only list the device removable and in USB interface type by default. Any kind of solution? Tried it yesterday. You can't just convert things to an ISO and expect them to be bootable! what is the working solution? Agreed. FreeNAS-11.3-U2.1.iso (FreeBSD based) tested using ventoy-1.0.08 hung during boot in both bios and uefi at the following error; da1: Attempt to query device size failed: NOT READY, Medium not present Ventoy Forums They can't eliminate them totally, but they can provide an additional level of protection. screenshots if possible Because if I know you ever used Ventoy in a Secure Boot enabled environment, I can now run any malicious payload I want at the UEFI level, on your computer. Thanks a lot. Getting the same error as @rderooy. Point 4 from Microsoft's official Secure Boot signing requirements states: Code submitted for UEFI signing must not be subject to GPLv3 or any license that purports to give someone the right to demand authorization keys to be able to install modified forms of the code on a device. and reboot.pro.. and to tinybit specially :) Joined Jul 18, 2020 Messages 4 Trophies 0 . I really fail to fathom how people here are disputing that if someone agrees to enroll Ventoy in a Secure Boot environment, it only means that they agree to trust the Ventoy application, and not that they grant it the right to just run whatever bootloader anybody will now be able to throw at their computer through Ventoy (which may very well be a malicious bootloader ran by someone who is not the owner of that computer but who knows or hopes that the user enrolled Ventoy).

Cemetery Monument Setting Compound, Hertz Do Not Rent List Customer Service, Concordia Parish Coroners Office, Articles V